What technical checks (a.k.a. quality checks) should your editorial team be completing? When should technical checks be done? And how can you optimize the process for speed and efficiency? We break down what you need to know in this blog post.

How can you tell if it's time for your team to move to a new editorial management system (a.k.a. peer review software)? This blog post covers the key indicators to look for whether you're considering trying software for the first time or migrating from one system to another.

Join Scholastica's head of marketing and community development, Danielle Padula, and founder of the industry-leading Journalology newsletter and consultancy, James Butcher, for a water cooler chat about how the role of journal editors is transforming with technology on September 27th at 3 PM UTC in honor of Peer Review Week 2024.

The 2024 ISMTE Conference offered a window into the most pressing issues for editorial teams today and a welcome opportunity for editors, publishers, and vendors to share workflow innovations. Here's a roundup of key takeaways from the conference.

How can journals tell which aspects of their peer review processes work well and which may need some work? EASE has released new guidelines for assessing peer review quality to help journal publishers and editors get closer to an answer.

What will the next iteration of scholarly journal peer review look like? That's the question team Scholastica is pondering this Peer Review Week. Here are the primary issues and innovation areas we're tracking with high-level breakdowns of the latest updates.