It's not easy to be productive all of the time - even for those working in academia! Here are some top tips to help you stay efficient!

How can scholars receive recognition for their review contributions at different journals regardless of the openness of the review? ORCID, CASRAI & F1000 Working Group propose a plan.

What steps can scholarly journal editors take to attract more high-quality submissions needed to grow the reputation and impact of their journal? This panel-style webinar explores the many angles of this question.

Anita Harris managing editor of SubStance: A Review of Theory and Literary Criticism shares tips to write constructive rejections that authors may actually appreciate

Having a plan in place to quickly and efficiently bring on new editors can smooth editorial board transitions and help spur positive innovations at your journal.

During free on-demand webinar editors share tales from the field and insights on what it takes to get an open access publication off the ground.

Neil Christensen is helping pioneer a new model for OA publishing, by giving value back to the academic community in dollars.

One of the top challenges and simultaneous best opportunities for new open access journals to develop a following is to find a unique niche in the marketplace.

New features to empower editors to keep peer review moving forward including, the ability to accept and submit reviews on behalf of reviewers, and advanced manuscript search.

A Library Sciences Masters student, recently sent us a Slideshare presentation titled, 'What's Wrong With Scholarly Publishing Today?'by Bjorn Brembs . It provided a ton of illuminating data on problems that scientists see with academic publishing.