Whether you have a journal management system or you're considering adopting one, this blog post will help you start thinking about how you can use software to keep your editorial team on track and save time.

One key promotion outlet often overlooked by journals, which is arguably more effective than the rest, is building an email list. Here are tips to get started.

While offering reviewers any form of guidance is better than none, being thorough and creating a reviewer checklist is by far the best way to help reviewers know the expectations of your journal.

Scholars as well as universities, research foundations, and government organizations, are encouraging journals to take steps to make their content more accessible and engaging. As a result, the notion of brand-name journals is changing.

The role of the journal editor is changing fast. What was once a job centered on managing peer review has evolved to include new steps to ensure journal articles reach their intended audience.

Despite some editors questioning the Web 2.0 transition, there are scholarly journals that have been successfully publishing solely online for years that have reaped many benefits as a result.

If scholars are searching for individual articles rather than journals, it begs the question: why not publish journal content on a rolling basis instead of compiling articles into issues?

When handled well, R&Rs don't have to be painful for authors or cause lengthy holdups in your publishing process.

How can scholars receive recognition for their review contributions at different journals regardless of the openness of the review? ORCID, CASRAI & F1000 Working Group propose a plan.

How journal editors and publishers are tracking alternative metrics data and pinpointing the metrics that matter most to them in order to improve their publications.