Image Credit: Surface
Image Credit: Surface

Is getting a law review article published on your list of goals for 2025? If so, you’ve come to the right place!

In this guide, we round up top tips to help legal scholars improve their publication prospects based on the Scholastica team’s experience supporting the submissions and article selection processes of hundreds of law reviews and our latest data learnings.

Use the quick links below to jump to specific sections of interest.

  1. Craft a compelling article
  2. Make a targeted submission list
  3. Track law review opening timelines
  4. Devise a clear submissions strategy
  5. Hone your article framing and title
  6. Get to the point in your introduction and conclusion
  7. Check your citations, then check them again
  8. Stick to law reviews’ submission guidelines
  9. Take advantage of group submission tools
  10. Don’t hesitate to ask questions
  11. Know when to expedite and how
  12. Respond to editor inquiries promptly

1. Craft a compelling article

Of course, the first step to submitting to law reviews is writing a compelling article! Where to start? Below are recommendations based on advice we’ve heard from editors.

  • Start with your interests: Choose a subject area that genuinely excites you based on your legal studies, career, or personal experiences. When you’re passionate about a subject, it shows in your writing.
  • Identify gaps in existing literature: Read recent law review articles and identify areas where scholars disagree or where questions remain unanswered. Look for emerging trends or technologies that existing legal frameworks haven’t addressed.
  • Focus on timeliness: Choose a topic relevant to current legal debates, pending legislation, or recent court decisions. Timeliness will make your article more likely to be noticed and cited if published.
  • Ensure practical Relevance: Ask yourself — “Does this topic have real-world implications for lawmakers, attorneys, or judges?” Practical topics are often more compelling to readers and editors.
  • Refine Your Scope: Avoid overly broad topics (e.g., “criminal justice reform”). Narrow your focus to a specific issue, jurisdiction, or case study (e.g., “the impact of cash bail reform in New York State”).
  • Check for Originality: Conduct a preemption check to ensure a thorough analysis of your topic doesn’t already exist. Law review editors prioritize fresh insights.

For more tips from law review editors, check out this blog post.

2. Make a targeted submission list

Next, you’ll need to decide which law reviews you want to target.

Law review submissions may feel like a numbers game at times. But, in truth, it really is about quality over quantity, so be selective when making a list of law reviews to send your paper to and narrow it down to the ones that are likely to be the best fit for your particular piece and publication goals.

Multiple factors will come into play here, including:

  • The aims and scope of your article: For example, if your paper is on a niche topic, such as the legal implications of pollutants in a particular US state, you may be better off submitting to local law reviews and/or specialty titles focused on environmental issues.
  • Law review prestige: There may be one or more specific well-known journals that you’re especially keen on getting published in, such as those listed higher in the Washington & Lee Law Journal Rankings. Just be sure not to prioritize rankings over article fit!
  • Journal impact and visibility: To expand the potential reach of your article, you may also seek to publish in law reviews that follow search engine optimization best practices like those listed here and that offer digital promotion opportunities

Start by creating a list of 3-5 top-choice law reviews based on your article topic and publication goals. Once you have a shortlist, you can start looking for alternate options (aim for around ten or more). Using Scholastica, you can quickly sort law reviews by category (e.g., general law, civil rights, constitutional) to help narrow things down.

If there’s one law review you’re particularly interested in, now’s also a good time to check if they offer an exclusive submission track option where you can pre-commit to publishing in that law review if they accept your article. As the name “exclusive track” suggests, you’ll have to agree to only submit to that one law review for a designated exclusive timeframe (usually 1-3 weeks). Exclusively submitting to a law review is a definitive way to communicate that it’s your first pick and move your article toward the top of the queue.

3. Track law review opening timelines

As you narrow down your law review shortlist, you’ll want to start thinking about submission timing.

Of course, if you’re planning to pursue an exclusive track, you’ll already have a target date based on the law review’s guidelines.

If you’re not submitting to an exclusive track to start, there is no hard science for when to submit to law reviews. However, past Scholastica submission season data does point to two peak periods:

  1. February through April (often referred to as the “spring submission season”)
  2. August through October (often referred to as the “fall submission season”)

These months have historically seen the most law review openings, submissions, and decisions. As a result, submitting within one of these peak timeframes could help your chances of publication because most law reviews will likely be open and reviewing articles.

Be sure to check Scholastica’s latest submission season data insights report to see if and how law review opening and submission timelines are changing. We release graphs and commentary on the previous year’s data each January.

It’s also important to note that some law reviews remain open during off-peak times to start collecting articles earlier than their peers or to finish filling their books if they still have slots open after the busy submission periods. Additionally, many law reviews solicit articles for symposia and special issues on an ad hoc basis. So, if you have an article ready and it’s not a prime submission time, there’s still a chance of getting an offer!

We have some easy ways to help you stay abreast of law review openings without going down search rabbit holes, including:

  1. Sign up for daily law review opening emails here
  2. Track updates on X (formerly Twitter) and Mastodon using the hashtag #LRSubmissions
  3. Reference the automatically updating table of open and closed law reviews on the Law Review Author Submissions Center website
  4. Check for law review updates in The Conversation — many editors post when they have remaining slots to fill in their volumes or are soliciting articles on particular topics

If you’re submitting to law reviews off-season, we recommend checking their websites for updates on if/when they’ll be actively reviewing new articles. Over the years, we have found that some lower-ranked and specialty journals will remain open when not reviewing submissions to have more to consider when they are ready to fill their books. In such cases, we strongly encourage them to note that on their “For Authors” page. If you can’t tell if a law review is reviewing articles from its website, don’t hesitate to reach out to the editors and ask!

Note: If you come across a law review with an open Scholastica account that reported it is closed elsewhere, please let us know. We will contact them to ensure they close their account if they aren’t seeking articles.

4. Devise a clear submissions strategy

Once you have a list of law reviews to target and a sense of when they’ll open, especially for any exclusive tracks, it’s time to devise a submission strategy. The main factors to consider are if and how you’ll 1) stagger your submissions and 2) customize them to stand out to specific journals (e.g., writing dedicated cover letters or even tweaking the framing/copy of your article to fit one or more particular titles).

Beginning with submission staggering, obviously, if you’re planning to pursue an exclusive law review track, you’ll need to submit to that title alone to start. But beyond that, you’ll be able to either make one bulk submission to your target law reviews or stagger your submissions. There are, of course, pros and cons to each approach to consider. For example, staggering submissions may afford you more time to customize them for target law reviews, but submitting to all your chosen titles at once can help ensure your article reaches them early in their article selection processes.

After nailing down your target law reviews, it’s time to review their article preferences and recent publication history. Then, use the insights you gain to identify opportunities to send tailored submissions to them as applicable. For example, if you’re submitting to a law review that favors regional pieces, you may be able to find ways to connect your paper to the geographic area(s) on which it’s focused.

Another way to customize submissions is to communicate if and how your article relates to works previously published in your target law reviews. In an anonymous contribution to Scholastica’s “Advice from outgoing law review editors” blog series, one editor noted, “My best advice is to learn more about the journals you are sending your manuscripts/expedite requests to before actually sending. You may find out our journal has published similar subject matter in recent years, and you may discover our journal has held symposia on a topic tangentially related to your work. It certainly assists our editorial board to use a previous manuscript to relate to one we make an offer on.”

So, do you have to send custom cover letters to every law review? We know a lot of authors wonder about this, and unfortunately, there is no definitive answer since every law review has its own preferences. With that said, first check if any of your target law reviews require cover letters — you’ll obviously want to include one for those. Otherwise, contributions from e-boards for Scholastica’s “Advice from outgoing law review editors” blog series suggest customization is only impactful when it reads as genuine. Editors have commented that they can spot forced flattery and connections drawn between a paper and their journal. So, if you don’t see an authentic way to customize a cover letter, it’s probably best to keep it simple or skip it (if not required).

5. Hone your article framing and title

Now that you have all your ducks in a row, it’s time to start preparing your submissions. Begin by thinking about your article framing.

Looking at the 25 most-used keywords for articles accepted via Scholastica in 2024 and 2023, it’s clear that submissions on timely topics tend to perform well. Among popular keywords in 2024 were “antitrust,” “artificial intelligence,” and “climate change.” So, it’s a good idea to emphasize how your article connects to current events if applicable. For example, if it’s about one of the most discussed but least published topics, make that known. Also, convey how your article relates to your experiences and why you are uniquely qualified to write on the topic (as discussed above). You can do this in the introduction of the article and any cover letters you send.

Once you’ve nailed down your article framing, try to look at your submission from the perspective of someone unfamiliar with the topic and take steps to ensure you’re putting your best foot forward. Specifically, focus on the title, abstract, and introduction. These are the first things editors will see, so you want to be sure they’re attention-grabbing and that they quickly and succinctly communicate the punchline of your paper.

In an X/Twitter thread of advice for authors posted on the 31st of January 2022, Former Senior Articles Editor for The Georgetown Law Journal Jesús Rodríguez noted: “Effective titles often caught my attention, especially when it was 1 AM and I was up assigning articles. Intros should tell us upfront what’s original about your piece — like in journalism, don’t bury the lede.”

Rodríguez added that authors should use their conclusion to build upon the article topic, leaving the reader with new insights rather than just reiterating the thesis. “Authors sometimes treat conclusions like 2–4-paragraph bows on top of the piece, but this is where the discussion and the implications of your argument need to be clearest. If a busy editor jumps to your conclusion after reading the intro, it should make them want to read the rest of the piece. They shouldn’t feel like they’ve read enough.”

Rodríguez also highlighted the following example of a law review article written in a compelling narrative style.

6. Get to the point in your introduction and conclusion

Speaking of abstracts, introductions, and conclusions, we can’t overemphasize the importance of getting to the point. In every iteration of Scholastica’s “Advice from outgoing law review editors” blog series, we’ve heard some version of this recommendation.

For example, in the 2022 advice series, former articles editor for the Michigan Law Review Latazia Carter said, “we truly appreciate succinct abstracts that provide an overview of the argument and explain how the piece is situated among other literature. This helps our editors sort articles and highlight especially promising pieces.”

Additionally, former articles editor for the Pepperdine Law Review Derek Kliewer advised, “the keywords and abstract are crucial to editors who are looking at hundreds of articles throughout the cycle. Make those as clear and captivating as they can be.”

Pulling back more broadly, this is really about making all of the words in your submission count. Remember, the goal is to write a compelling article, not to hit the maximum word limit. And that means getting to the heart of the matter fast.

7. Check your citations, then check them again

Another submission prep step we can’t stress enough is to check your article citations! Law review editors are hyper-vigilant of citations and will flag areas of your article that could use additional references or any that appear incomplete. So make sure all of your legal assertions have complete and correct citations.

As former West Virginia Law Review editor Jordan McMinn explained, “having good citations is so important! It’s important because it’s often the first thing editors review and because it gives editors a good idea of how much effort it will take to bring the article to publication. We made many decisions where we were on the fence about offering publication, and it went one way or the other based on the abstract and citations.”

In the X/Twitter thread above, Former Senior Articles Editor for The Georgetown Law Journal Jesús Rodríguez acknowledged that untenured faculty might face the challenge of not having access to RAs to help check citations like their more senior colleagues. Rodríguez advised, “if you’re in this tough spot and under pressure to submit the piece this cycle because of job reqs, I think it would be a good idea to write a note to the journal explaining the situation and promising to clean up the cites before work begins on the piece if selected.”

8. Stick to law reviews’ submission guidelines

Next, before submitting to law reviews, be sure to read their author guidelines and preferences and adjust your article accordingly. This includes adhering to each law review’s formatting requirements and preferred submission method. You don’t want a law review to automatically reject your submission because it doesn’t meet a technical specification.

Of course, you’ll want to first ensure your article is clean without any typos, grammatical errors, or formatting issues. Next, look out for the following common submission specifications:

  1. Article length requirements: Many law reviews have hard article-length requirements. For example, Stanford Law Review states that the editors have a “30,000-word ceiling” for articles and a “preference for 20,000 words or fewer.”
  2. Style guidelines: Check for any article style guidelines on each law review’s “For Authors” pages. The main thing to keep in mind here is citation style. Most law reviews expect citations to conform to The Bluebook.
  3. File anonymization requirements: Another submission requirement to look out for is file anonymization specifications. There has been a trend of more law reviews implementing fully or semi-anonymized article selection processes to prevent implicit biases in decision making like Washington Law Review. If you’re unsure how to anonymize your article files, we have a guide here to help!
  4. Cover letter: Finally, check to see if any of the law reviews you’re targeting require cover letters, and be sure to submit one if asked — following instructions counts!

If you’re submitting via Scholastica, remember to use the “Guidelines” links below law reviews listed in the submission pool to quickly check their author guidelines without having to navigate away from the page/open extra tabs. You can also easily make anonymous submissions as needed. The submission pool now specifies law reviews that require anonymous articles, and the submission form includes upload fields for anonymized files. Learn more here.

9. Take advantage of group submission tools

If you decide to submit to multiple law reviews at one time, be sure to also take advantage of all of the group submission features Scholastica offers, including the ability to:

  • Include anonymized files in group submissions
  • Send expedite requests to one or more journals
  • Withdraw a manuscript from one or more journals
  • Accept/decline publication offers in bulk

Remember, you can also save time by communicating with law reviews in bulk via Scholastica. Authors have the option to send Discussion messages, decision responses, and expedite requests to multiple law reviews at once, as explained in the “Communicating” section of the Law Author Guide.

10. Don’t hesitate to ask questions

Throughout the submission process, you may have questions for law review editors, or you may want to send them an updated file, which is normal, and something editors will expect – so don’t hesitate to reach out! In those cases, just be sure to use each law review’s preferred communication method. For law reviews on Scholastica, that’s easy — use the Discussions feature. Your Discussion message will go directly to the law review’s editors and be stored next to your submission. Editors receive notifications for all new Scholastica Discussion messages, so they’ll be less likely to fall through the cracks than emails.

When working with law reviews that use Scholastica, be sure to also send expedite requests and responses to decisions via the system. The benefits are twofold: first, your communication will be more likely to be seen, and second, you’ll be making editors’ lives easier by helping them keep all of their law review work in one place.

Another quick tip: try to keep your emails brief. Make sure your subject line is clear, and state the aim of your outreach in the first sentence. Editors get inundated with emails during submission season, and it’s easy to overlook questions buried in text.

11. Know when to expedite and how

Another key submission area we often hear questions from authors about is expedite requests. It’s important to know when it’s worth submitting an expedite request and when to hold back.

Wait, what is an expedite exactly? An expedite request is when you notify one or more of your preferred law reviews that your article has received an offer from another law review and ask them to send you a decision before your response to that offer is due.

Expedite requests can help push your article higher up the submissions pile at some law reviews, but you must use them strategically. If you’re going for a top law review, be sure to wait until you have an offer from a similarly ranked publication before sending an expedite request. Also, when making expedite requests, be sure that you actually have an offer on the table. Don’t make any assumptions based on your paper going to full board review. While a strong indicator that your article may be accepted, a full board review is not a guarantee, so most law reviews will not grant expedites in that situation and may be put off by such requests.

12. Respond to editor inquiries promptly

As you submit to law reviews and hear back from them, it’s a best practice to respond promptly to any inquiries you receive. As an author, you don’t want to hear radio silence when waiting for decision notifications or replies to emails you’ve sent journals. Remember that law review editors feel the same and try to extend them the same courtesies you expect to receive.

For example, if a law review accepts your article and you want to wait to hear back from another journal before deciding whether to publish with them, let the editor know and request to have the offer due date extended if needed. And once you have accepted a publication offer, be sure to let the other law reviews you’ve submitted to know so they can take your article out of their review queue. Again, you can do this in bulk via Scholastica.

Putting it all together

We hope you found these tips helpful! Following them will improve your chances of getting an acceptance decision.

Finally, don’t forget to take advantage of the Scholastica submission resources at your disposal! Visit The Scholastica Law Review Submissions Center for access to:

  • Submission pro tips
  • Law review submission data insights
  • An automatically updating table of open and closed law reviews

If you have any Scholastica-specific submission questions, you’ll find answers to them in our handy Law Author Guide. And if there’s anything you’re unsure of, you can contact our team at support@scholasticahq.com. We’re here to help!

*Update Note: This post was originally published on the 25th of January 2023 and updated on the 24th of January 2025.

Law Review Daily Alerts