There are certain considerations OA journal teams should keep in mind when choosing which peer review and publishing tools and systems to use. In this post, we outline 3 things to consider.

New public resource page provides an overview of the academic-led publishing movement and resources for scholars and institutions looking to support or launch academic-led titles.

This post examines why academic-led journal publishing is key to lowering the rising cost of research and the technology that's defining the academic-led publishing movement, including a detailed case study.

When it comes to effective editorial team operations, Jennifer Mahar, executive peer review manager at Origin Editorial, says there are certain hallmarks that set apart the best teams from the rest.

The new 2nd edition of the Definitive Guide to Digital Journal Publishing covers everything you need to know to develop more digitally-driven publishing practices and improve your journal's online presence.

Ashley Amaya, editor-in-chief of Survey Practice, discusses why they moved journal peer review and publishing to Scholastica to centralize their workflows, and how Scholastica typesetting has enabled them to publish mobile-friendly articles faster.

What can editors do to avoid sending review assignments and hearing crickets? It can be difficult to predict whether a reviewer might become unresponsive. However, there are ways for editors to try to avoid such situations.

DOAJ founder Lars Bjørnshauge and Editor-in-Chief Tom Olijhoek discuss the mission of DOAJ, its journal criteria, and plans for the future.

The start of a new year is always a good time for reflection. As we head into the new year, we wanted to take a look back and share some blog highlights from 2017.

Since December 2016, Editage Insights has been running a survey of scholars to gauge their opinions on academic journal publishing. In this interview, Clarinda Cerejo, editor-in-chief, shares preliminary findings from the first 5,000 responses.